Arguing Breach, Simply.
I like this direct language from the introductory paragraph of a new Ninth Circuit case – Arizona v. Tohonto O’odham Nation, 2016 WL 1211834:
“This appeal requires us to consider whether sophisticated, represented parties really meant what they wrote in a gaming compact that was duly executed after years of tedious negotiations. Like the district court, we hold the parties to their words, and affirm the district court’s orders……”
Illustrates a simple, direct and effective way to argue breach:
Defendants negotiated and signed a contract – they should be held to their words.
Latest Posts
Over the last few months, I have had the honor of interviewing some of San Diego’s top trial lawyers on my podcast, the Trial Call 10. Even with decades...
My Covid Backlog – In The Rear View Mirror!
I tried a couple of cases to the bench the first half of this year. But, barring my entry into a new matter shortly before a trial, which occasionally...